UK REFERENDUM
23rd June 2016
Britain has chosen to exit as a member of the EU.
Using the blueprint created by the Lightworkers of Lithuania in 2000
that allowed 'Suppressed Countries To Go Free' -
the British people stayed strong in the face of extreme fear tactics
adding 'People Power' to the blueprint and have led the way for a new era of LIGHT in the future of Earth
THE DECREE THAT WAS DONE AROUND THE WORLD BEFORE THE REFERENDUM
By Divine Decree, in the name of God, under the Law of Grace, as
a Lightworker on Earth, I ask Lord Archangel Metatron of the Ascended
Realms of Light, to assist Highest Divine Order to take place for the
Ascension Plan for Earth, on all levels and aspects, concerning the
outcome of the United Kingdom European Union membership referendum,
being held in the UK and Gibraltar on the 23rd of June 2016.
So Be it. So it is. So Mote it be. It is done.
Top inventor Sir James Dyson lays out his ten point plan for the
future of Britain post-Brexit
by Sir James Dyson
OUR future outside the EU is very bright.
We have nothing to fear and everything to gain from the new
opportunities. Of course we need strong leadership but here are my ten
action points for the future.
TRADE:
The EU needs us more than we need them — to the tune of £100 billion
this year.
We can capitalise on the UK’s position as one of the EU’s
largest, and closest, trading partners.
IMMIGRATION:
Now we are in control, we can set about attracting the best talent from
around the world on equal terms and reassure non-UK citizens living here
that they remain welcome and valued.
THE POUND:
A lower Pound makes our exports cheaper and more competitive, which is
why our biggest blue chip exporters have seen shares rising, not
falling.
ECONOMY:
Let us make the most of setting our own policies in the best interests
of this country from fishing to farming. Our biggest opportunity will
come from our ability to quickly adjust to the rapidly growing economies
of Asia and the rest of the world.
INVESTMENT:
Free from the shackles of the EU, Britain can negotiate its own trade
deals.
This will make us more competitive and open up new markets and
export opportunities. It is time to invest and to create more jobs.
TARIFFS:
People fear the EU may impose tariffs. Yet the rest of the world
trades successfully with the EU and so will we. Businesses face bigger
risks and uncertainties every day than the threat of tariffs.
EDUCATION:
Our universities are the envy of the world. They offer the biggest
opportunity for the UK to engage the brightest minds. Research grants
must be protected, as was promised in the campaign.
Our future depends on it.
LEARN FROM OTHERS:
Singapore gained independence from Malaysia and transformed itself into
a great exporter — the highest per person of anywhere in the world.
It welcomes foreign trade and investment and, through a
combination of low taxes and liberal immigration, has transformed itself
into a hi-tech economy. Singapore is cosmopolitan, outward-looking and
world-leading – and we can do the same.
SEIZE THE DAY:
Our leaders must capitalise on this historic opportunity. We are free
from the shackles of EU bureaucracy, but need to define the plan. It’s
time to seize the day and become a hi-tech exporting nation by investing
in the brightest minds and the most ambitious research.
STOP TALKING OURSELVES
DOWN: The time for scaremongering and doomsayers
is over. Britain is open for business and we are more ambitious than
ever.
thesun.co.uk
http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/683406/Britain-economy-stronger-after-Brexit-Lord-Jones-says
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/24/this-was-the-day-the-british-people-defied-their-jailers/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/24/the-european-elite-forgot-that-democracy-is-the-one-thing-britai/
http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/06/24/a-blow-for-peace-and-democracy-why-the-british-said-no-to-europe/
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx FURTHER LIST OF OPINIONS RE BREXIT
1.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zRZALkAdZn0
Boris Johnson’s speech
2.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/24/this-was-the-day-the-british-people-defied-their-jailers/
3.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/24/the-european-elite-forgot-that-democracy-is-the-one-thing-britai/
4.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/immigration/
5.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/17/young-europhiles-need-to-stop-patronising-their-elders--we-know/pun
Message to the young who think
they know best about Europe!!
6.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/politics/britains-decision-to-leave-the-eu-is-hillary-clintons-worst-nigh/
Hilary Clintons worst nightmare
7.
UK Telegraph on 25 June 2016
Sarah
Palin compares Brexit to Declaration of Independence
(Sarah Palin was the former Republican Vice President Candidate
and former Governor of Alaska)
When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people
to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with
another...
The UK knew - it was that time. And now is that time in the USA.
The Brexit referendum is akin to our own Declaration of Independence.
May that refreshed spirit of sovereignty spread over the pond to
America's shores!
Congratulations, smart Brits. Good on you for ignoring all the fear
mongering from special interest globalists who tend to aim for that
apocalyptic One World Government that dissolves a nation's
self-determination and sovereignty... the EU being a One World
Government mini-me.
America can learn an encouraging lesson from this. It is time to
dissolve political bands that connect us to agendas not in our best
interest. May UN shackles be next on the chopping block.
8.
List of countries in the EU plus countries in process of entering.
http://europa.eu/about-eu/countries/member-countries/
Note: e.g.
If Turkey were to join the EU,
79 million people would have the right to live and work in the UK and
Turkey would become a significant power in the EU.
9.
Immigration figures.
http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/
Known recorded number of immigrants settled in Britain in last
10 years =
3.45 million.
The figure does not include all the illegals or additional family
members arriving or all the children being born. Brexit campaigners said
the huge numbers placed massive pressure on public services including
schools, hospitals and transport.
10.
11.
Throughout this long and often acrimonious referendum campaign,
the most striking fact about the Remainers is that they have failed to
articulate a single positive reason for staying in the EU.
Instead, they have subjected voters to a barrage of scaremongering, with
the aid of a once proudly independent Civil Service, pinning all their
hopes on persuading the British people that the dangers of withdrawing
from Brussels outweigh the many drawbacks of belonging to it. In doing
so, they have had to seek the support of the likes of Jeremy Corbyn, Ed
Miliband, Gordon Brown and Tony Blair — from the very party voters
rightly rejected at the last election on the grounds that they couldn’t
be trusted.
12.
Boris Johnson – to the young people. Boris
Johnson urged unity in the nation and speaking of the bright future that
now awaits an outward-looking Britain.
“I want to speak to the millions of people who did not vote for
this outcome especially young people who may feel that this decision in
some way involves pulling up the drawbridge or any kind of isolationism.
I think the very opposite is true.
“To those who may be anxious at home or abroad this does not
mean that that he UK will be in anyway less united nor indeed does it
mean that it will be any less European.
He
added: “We cannot turn our backs on Europe. We are part of Europe. Our
children and grandchildren will continue to have a wonderful future as
Europeans travelling to the continent, understanding the languages and
cultures that make up of common European civilisation.”
It is now expected that Mr Johnson will stand as leader, with Mr
Gove, the Justice Secretary, becoming the Chancellor in a “Brexit
Government”, sources claimed. 13.
Australia should aim for a trade deal with the UK post Brexit
By Alan Oxley, RMIT University | The Conversation – 20 hours ago
Brexit may be bad for share markets in the short term, but it could
present an opportunity for more liberal trade in the long run. The
Australian government is negotiating a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with
the European Union (EU) but it may be better to put that on a very slow
track because there are advantages in completing an FTA with the UK
first.
The UK is not a member of the Eurozone and has adjusted to the impact of
the 2008 global financial crisis, putting it in a manageable position.
The UK is Australia’s eighth largest two-way trading partner and
accounts for around 25% of the total trade of the EU’s 28 members with
Australia. Services account for around half of Australia’s trade with
the UK.
Germany’s total trade is smaller: it is Australia’s tenth largest
trading partner and services contribute less than a quarter of the total
value of trade. OECD analysis shows Germany protects its services
industries more than the UK.
There are advantages to Australia’s completing an FTA with the UK first.
It would be quicker and easier than negotiating with the EU and more
likely produce better access for Australian services businesses to the
UK market. As a member of the EU, the UK is obliged to follow a common
EU position. Greater German restrictions on foreign services suppliers
would make the EU position as a whole less liberal.
Historically, the UK has been a leading advocate of free trade in
Europe. If it’s freed of the requirement to support consensus in the EU,
it is likely to be even more liberal outside it.
As demonstrated in Australia’s latest FTAs and the Trans-Pacific
Partnership Agreement (TPP) a leading focus for opening markets today is
to remove restrictions on foreign services business, such as banking and
accountancy. Traditionally, trade liberalisation has focused on reducing
trade barriers - tariffs. Most tariffs on goods worldwide today are low.
This is also feature of the Trans-Pacific Trade and Investment
Partnership (TPIP) which the EU and the US are struggling to complete.
The
World Trade Organisation (WTO) annual report records that around one
fifth of world trade is services. Services also contribute to the cost
of producing products that are traded, for example with transport or IT.
Providing competitively-priced services is now a critical element
globally in getting returns from international trade.
Once outside the EU, the UK would have positive influence in enhancing
global efforts to open services markets. About 50 members of the WTO
(total membership is 162), which generate most of the global services
traded, have been pushing to further open services markets. The EU is
key player in that process.
But its negotiating modus operandi is that it only presents positions
which are consensus among all member states. Outside the EU and acting
as an independent party to the WTO, the UK would be likely to take
significantly more liberal positions.
OECD analysis shows that the UK and Netherlands loosened regulation to
create the most open services sectors in the EU. The services markets of
other major EU economies (Germany, France and Italy) are more regulated.
Australia and New Zealand have also been leaders in this sphere. The
ANZCERTA free trade agreement between them was the first trade agreement
to commit to fully open services between two economies.
Australia could retain goodwill with the EU by extending, on an interim
basis, its standing policy now in FTAs to provide freedom to invest up
to a billion dollars. Australia can commit to making it permanent when a
full agreement is negotiated with the EU later.
What the Brexit result should do is focus the EU on the very deep
problems in its own backyard - the Eurozone. While Greece’s incapacity
to meet its financial obligations has drawn most attention, Spain and
Italy still have mountainous debt respectively equivalent to 150% and
200% of GDP and record unemployment.
German monetary policy has shaped this circumstance. It prospers while
standards of living in the southern tier of the Eurozone fall.
With luck, Britain’s intention to withdraw will return the focus of
members of the Eurozone to its highly fragile financial situation. This
is the problem in the EU and they and we should all be focusing on it,
not the Brexit result.
Alan Oxley, Chair, APEC Study Centre, expertise international trade law,
economics, Asian regional development, RMIT University
This article was originally published on The Conversation.
14.
PART 1 of
Nigel Farages post-Brexit EU Parliament Speech
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=woaS1b_seEM
PART 2 of Nigel Farages post-Brexit EU Parliament Speech
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-QRhp6H-4w
15.
The Guardian newspaper 27th June
Mervyn King Former Bank of England governor says
Brexit 'does NOT mean job cuts'
Mervyn King blasted the Remain camp claiming that they were guilty of
Project Fear and he also accused Remain of treating people considering
voting Leave like "idiots". He said voters had not been impressed by
"scaremongering tactics".
He told the BBC: "I think the Treasury is in a difficult position now
because it did make very clear forecasts which I think were exaggerated
in terms of at least the certainty they led people to believe could be
attached to those forecasts, and now I think they're going to have to
row back.
He also said that if Britain's economy slows after the referendum
decision to leave the EU, it would not be the right time for a budget
that cuts spending and raises taxes.
Chancellor George Osborne said earlier today that he would not rush
through a so-called emergency budget, despite having suggested during
the campaign that he would have to do so after a vote to Leave the EU.
"We've already seen in the space of this morning that there will not be
an emergency budget, and I think that that was perhaps the nadir of the
exaggeration," King told the BBC.
He added that volatility in UK shares following the UK vote to leave the
EU was "no reason for any of us to panic".
He predicted the long-term effect of a Brexit on GDP and he said it
would be a "fuss about nothing."
Jitters continued to plague the markets today as Britain’s economy
battled to come to terms with the implications of the Brexit vote.
The pound rallied slightly following a calming appearance by Chancellor
of the Exchequer George Osborne, who admitted despite the scaremongering
of the Remain camp before the European Union (EU) referendum, Britain
was still well and truly “open for business.”
The pound’s mini-revival was accompanied by similarly promising movement
in the FTSE 100, the index for the top-100 performing companies on the
London Stock Exchange.
While it did fall by 0.46 per cent as the markets opened, this was a
considerably more positive performance than expected and will help calm
fears leaving the EU will prove disastrous for the British economy.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/27/mervyn-king-brexit-treasury-claim-backfired-osborne
Mervyn King: Treasury's exaggerated Brexit claims backfired
Mervyn
King, the former Bank of England governor, has delivered his most
stinging criticism of
George Osborne
and the Treasury over the Brexit campaign, saying they will need to row
back from exaggerated claims that left him “baffled”. He said the nadir
of “the most dispiriting campaign in my lifetime” was a
claim that ministers would need to raise taxes and cut spending in an
emergency budget
to tackle a recession that was likely to follow a vote to leave the
European Union.
Lord King said it made no sense to set up a budget to cope with economic
trends five, 10 or 15 years ahead. He said the chancellor would need to
adopt the opposite policies – higher spending and cuts to taxes – to
lift the economy and offset the worst effects of a looming recession.
He said: “I think the government said things it is not easy to sustain
or support. If the Treasury forecasts are right and we face a recession,
then it would not be right to raise taxes and cut spending. So I was
baffled by the idea that an emergency budget would be either sensible in
the short term or that we knew anything like enough about the longer
term to make that judgment today.
“The Treasury is in a difficult position now because it did make
forecasts that were exaggerated in terms of at least the certainty and
now will have to row back.”
King was governor during the 2008 banking crisis before stepping down in
2013 to take up a position as a crossbench peer. He warned earlier in
the campaign
that both sides risked making claims
that stretched the truth and warned the debate could not be “reduced to
a cost/benefit analysis”.
He said: “I was travelling round the UK a lot at that time and I was
struck by how many people said to me they didn’t like the scaremongering
tactics, they didn’t like to be told that if they were to vote to leave
they would be idiots.
“If you say to someone: ‘You are an idiot if you don’t agree with me’,
you are not likely to bring them in your direction. It would have been
enough to say there would be a great deal of uncertainty, but they went
way beyond that, using precise numbers to say how much our living
standards might fall.”
16.
A powerful email about Brexit from a reader in Britain…
“Please, please, please, do not listen to the distorted views of
the mainstream media. Yes, immigration is a major problem. But not THE
REASON why the we voted to leave the EU. We as a people have demanded
our country back from the unelected elites which have become our
masters. An unelected EU government with no opposition, with the power
to make our laws and determine how we live our lives. Immigration is a
secondary topic, the economy is secondary, if we are worse off we will
live with our decision. If we suffer, so be it. Our freedom and the
freedom of our children is much more important. People have died in the
millions to fight for this basic right. We have given a shining example
of democracy to the world. We have put our country and our future above
our individual interests. The British lion has awakened from a long
sleep. Today I have never been more proud of the silent, decent Briton
who stood up to be counted.”
— From a King World News reader in Yorkshire
17.
Italian Journalist talks about Brexit and
Europe
Paulo Barnard was presenting his regular slot on economic talk
show La Gabbia days before Britain voted to leave the EU, when he
exposed some of the most common held myths about Brexit.
Asked if he thought Brexit would create a domino effect in
Europe, Barnard replies: “I hope. I hope it will destroy it.”
He continued: “If a Brit overlook’s Dover’s cliffs, what does he
see?
“He sees a Europe that from 2007 to today has lost its GDP to
the point of not getting it back. “He sees an unemployment rate that’s
double that of the UK. He sees banking gaps for €1.7 trillion in Europe,
that nobody is covering.
“He turns around to the other side and sees an America that from
2007 to today has regained all of their GDP and added 10% to the
national wealth.”
Barnard then cites
data
from economic think tank Open Europe that says the maximum loss for the
UK in leaving the EU would be 1 per cent of its GDP. In London, the loss
was 1.1 per cent.
Barnard then addresses the threat of a commercial block being
placed on Britain.
He says: “There’s just one small detail that no-one considers -
Europe exports to the UK 10 times what the UK exports in Europe.
“It will be very difficult for France, Germany, Italy and Spain
to lose billions of exports by blocking the UK.”
On leaving the single market, Barnard says: “There are 500
million potential European consumers that are in great trouble.
“While the UK, deregulated and outside the EU, has something
like 2.2bn potential customers in emerging countries.”
He dismisses the impact on British
business -
saying it will effect 0.4 per cent of the UK’s largest companies such as
Shell, GlaxoSmithKlein and Unilever.
To loud applause, Baranrd concludes: “Now the UK wants to leave
from this Economocide, from this authoritarian EU and from this
nomenclature. Then for what are the Bilderberg’s men trembling for? What
are the huge companies afraid of?
“They’re not scared of economic loss - they are scared over the
loss of control over a neb-feudal, authoritarian and anti-democratic
project called the European Union.”
THE COMPLETE VOTE OUTCOME WITH ALL DETAILS
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-36616028
"Brexit is not a disaster for the world economy"
It's worth noting that some
analysts are more sanguine. On Friday, the British research consultancy
Capital Economics circulated a note with this headline: "'Brexit’ is not
a disaster for the world economy."
Before the vote, Capital Economics
produced a paper that was somewhat less dire than other economic
analyses out there. Their broad takeaway is that there will be a lot of
turmoil for Britain, but the country will ultimately adjust. Some
highlights:
It is highly probable that a
favourable trade agreement would be reached after Brexit as there are
advantages for both sides in continuing a close commercial arrangement.
But the
worst-case scenario, in which Britain faces tariffs under ‘most-favoured
nation’ rules, is certainly no disaster.
Exporters would face some additional costs, such as complying with the
European Union’s rules of origin, if they were outside the single
market. However, these factors would be an inconvenience rather than a
major barrier to trade. ...
Financial services have more to
lose immediately after a European Union exit than most other sectors of
the economy. Even in the best case, in which passport rights were
preserved, the United Kingdom would still lose influence over the single
market’s rules.
The City would probably be hurt in the short term, but it would
not spell disaster. The City’s competitive
advantage is founded on more than just unfettered access to the single
market. A European Union exit would enable the United Kingdom to broker
trade deals with emerging markets that could pay dividends for the
financial services sector in the long run.
Concerns about a drying up of foreign direct investment if Britain votes
to leave the European Union are somewhat overblown.
Access to the single market is not the only reason that firms invest in
Britain. Other advantages to investing here should ensure that foreign
firms continue to want a foothold in the country. It is likely Britain
would remain a haven for foreign direct investment flows even if it was
outside of the European Union. Of course, we could see a period of weak
foreign direct investment inflows as the United Kingdom’s new
relationship is renegotiated. However, if Britain is able to obtain
favourable terms, then foreign direct investment would probably recoup
this lost ground.
Here are the latest region by region voting figures.
Eastern
East Midlands
London
North-east
Northern Ireland
North-west
Scotland
South-east
South-west & Gibraltar
Wales
West Midlands
Yorkshire & The Humber
|